• FreeTrainers.com Forums
• Health Supplements
• canseco laughs at andro

Group: Health Supplements

canseco laughs at andro

NeedaSpot Posts: 30 Joined: 2005/02/17	2005/02/26, 04:08 PM i recently read cansecos book and he seems to scoff at the effects of andro at least relative to steroids. Is he downplaying the seriousness of andro?? i know andro-containig products like animal stak have a disclaimer listing all the possible side effects, but are these side effects a real possibility if the product is taken as directed and not abused or are the companies just trying to cover themselves from any potential lawsuits if a customer does abuse the product?? will taking animal stak really mimic the results one would get with a cycle of steroids?? what distinguishes a prohormone from a steroid?? and with something like andro which is a prohormone, is it necessary to take a product like ergophrams 6 OXO or clomid when you stop using it?? i know i have a lot of questions but i would appreciate any help anyone could give me. i just want to educate myself.
	2005/02/27, 06:39 AM yes pro-hormones are precursors to steroids....so yes they are less effective than real steroids....however their sideeffects are just as powerful as of steroids so yes you still need to take anti-estrogen conversion drugs and yes you probably will still need to take drugs to kick start natural testosterone production...it all depends on the dosages you plan on doing and the stacks you plan to use...is Andro considerably weaker compared to D-Bol and Dianabol? probably....will you get similar side effects with high enough dosages ...Yes....so precaution is key.... What's your take on his book overall? The media didn't take too kindly to his book from what I keep hearing...
NeedaSpot Posts: 30 Joined: 2005/02/17	2005/03/04, 01:59 PM I know the animal stak which is now illegal comes with estrogen blockers and after a cycle i was thinking ergopharm's 6OXO would be good to take. thanks menace.