A place for men to gather and share experiences, advice and information amongst themselves.
Join group
Velasca
Posts:
441
Joined: 2006/10/26 |
2006/12/30, 07:37 AM
I did a fitbuddy search on this topic and found the article about whey protein being helpdul with this. Is there any other articles that anyone has come across to substantiate this? and how much does it really help?
My husband is 52 and has been taking whey protein since his mid 20's. He recently bought some supplements that I thought were just a gimmick.. cancer does not run in his family at all.. altho i know that doesnt necessarily mean anything either.. He has always been very healthy and in shape... Should we even bother with any other supplements and just hope the whey works? |
| |
Carivan
Posts:
8,542
Joined: 2002/01/20 |
2006/12/30, 02:02 PM
Cooked tomatoes are #1, as in sauces, and tomatoe juice. The antioxidant here is Lycopene. Also helps reduce risk of heart ailments. Now, I'm not saying to go out and buy the tablets and start supplementing, but eat the stuff often. ALso you may want to do a search on Lycopene.-------------- A little discipline at the table and at the gym might help reduce that belly! Ivan Montreal Canada (City of Festivals) |
bb1fit
Posts:
11,105
Joined: 2001/06/30 |
2006/12/30, 02:20 PM
I agree here Carivan..there is no known research that shows that taking lycopene supplements will do jack squat. However eating lycopene rich sources will.
Saw Palmetto may be useful, I have used it for years now. As well as Stinging Nettle. Now, this is not meant to be funny, should in fact be 'news to you and your husbands ears'....and I have numerous studies that back this up... (HealthDayNews) -- Sexually active men are not at a greater risk of developing prostate cancer, a new study says, and frequent ejaculation may reduce their chances of getting the disease. Previous studies have produced conflicting evidence on the risks or benefits of ejaculation in connection with the development of prostate cancer. Some found that increased sexual activity lowers the risk of the tumors, the second most common form of cancer in American men. Others found just the opposite. The new study, appearing in the April 7 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association (news - web sites), followed almost 30,000 doctors, dentists, and other health professionals participating in a long-term look at cancer and chronic disease. The men ranged in age from 46 to 81. As part of the research project, the men, who were mostly white, were asked about their sex life, specifically how frequently they ejaculated -- a question meant to capture not only intercourse but masturbation and nocturnal emissions -- during their 20s, their 40s and in the previous year. "Not only did not pose an adverse risk factor, but it possibly could be associated with a lower risk of prostate cancer," said Dr. Michael Leitzmann, an epidemiologist at the National Cancer Institute (news - web sites) and the leader of the study. Men who reported between four and seven ejaculations a month over their adult lifetime had an 11 percent lower chance of developing prostate cancer than those who ejaculated no more than three times a month. Every three-ejaculations-per-week increase across a man's lifetime was associated with a 15 percent drop in prostate cancer risk. The modest effect of occasional ejaculation could simply illustrate that it doesn't raise the risk of prostate cancer, Leitzmann and his colleagues said. But men who ejaculated at least 21 times a month had a 33 percent lower chance of developing prostate cancer, suggesting that frequent ejaculation does indeed protect the prostate from growing tumors. However, the number of cancer cases in this small group was itself small -- only 60 out of the 1,449 cases overall, undercutting the strength of the finding. Men who reported such frequent ejaculation in the year before entering the study got even more protection against cancer. Again, however, the number of tumor cases in this group was tiny. How frequent ejaculation might protect the prostate, a walnut-sized gland that provides the liquid medium for sperm during emission, isn't known. The researchers suggest that ejaculation could help purge the prostate of cancer-causing chemicals or stunt the formation of crystalloids that have been linked to tumors in some men. Another, more speculative, possibility is that the relief of stress associated with ejaculation could lead to hormonal activity that's less likely to promote cancerous changes in the gland. Until scientists learn more about how the prostate benefits from frequent ejaculation, Leitzmann said, it's too early to recommend that men step up their sexual activity. "Our study should stimulate progress toward as opposed to putting out a public health recommendation," he said. Dr. Graham Giles, an Australian cancer researcher who has looked at sexual activity and prostate cancer risk, said the latest study "goes a long way to confirm" his own group's findings that frequency of ejaculation and prostate tumors are inversely connected. "Very few studies, like this one and ours, have measured total ejaculations," Giles said. "Most have relied solely on the frequency of sexual intercourse, and therefore probably missed measuring a lot of male sexual activity." Neither Giles' study nor the most recent one looked at the ejaculation frequency during adolescence -- a period that's worth considering, both Giles and Leitzmann said. "These may be crucial" in dictating the fate of the prostate, Giles said. "It is very possible that the risk of developing cancer later in life is set up much earlier in life, when the gland is developing." Meanwhile, another new study finds that a common screening test for prostate cancer can help predict whether the disease will return in men who were initially treated with hormonal therapy. Researchers at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston found that different rises and falls in levels of the blood test -- protein-specific antigen, or PSA -- are key. The study of 1,454 men with prostate cancer, which appears in the April 7 issue of the Journal of the National Cancer Institute, found that the risk of death from the disease was 13 times higher in those whose PSA levels rose quickly and then fell slowly after hormonal therapy compared to those whose levels rose slowly and fell quickly. By Adam Marcus -------------- "If it ain't broke, you aren't trying." |
Velasca
Posts:
441
Joined: 2006/10/26 |
2006/12/30, 05:15 PM
ty both for the input..i will google lycopene. as far as bbfit's post..well.. *blush* :p
|
Carivan
Posts:
8,542
Joined: 2002/01/20 |
2006/12/30, 05:45 PM
It's true!:big_smile:-------------- A little discipline at the table and at the gym might help reduce that belly! Ivan Montreal Canada (City of Festivals) |
Velasca
Posts:
441
Joined: 2006/10/26 |
2007/01/01, 12:44 AM
bbfit..which saw palmetto do u take? and how much dosage..i saw regular SP cap and SP berry cap
|
bb1fit
Posts:
11,105
Joined: 2001/06/30 |
2007/01/01, 01:10 AM
There are different 'versions' of Saw palmetto. You can get dried berries, tea, powdered capsules, tablets, liquid tinctures, and liposterolic extracts.
Look for the product label to indicate that contents are standardized and contain 85% to 95% fatty acids and sterols. Can't stress this enough. -------------- "If it ain't broke, you aren't trying." |
bb1fit
Posts:
11,105
Joined: 2001/06/30 |
2007/01/01, 01:11 AM
Should add that Saw Palmetto may well help with hair loss also. As one of its 'functions' is blocking DHT, which most know by now is a major cause of hair loss.-------------- "If it ain't broke, you aren't trying." |
Velasca
Posts:
441
Joined: 2006/10/26 |
2007/01/01, 09:52 AM
ty again :)
|