|
2003/02/20, 08:14 AM
just did a little research on cell tech, they claim its 19 times better than creatine cell tech is made ny muscletech
|
|
|
|
2003/02/20, 12:06 PM
*cough.... bullcrap. Claim is outrageous. muscletech prolly grabbed random people of the streets and had them wear white lab coats to look like researchers in their pictures.
--------------
MOO!
|
|
2003/02/20, 12:22 PM
19 times better, huh? So if I normally gain 10lbs or so taking pure creatine, then I'll gain 190lbs by taking Cell Tech??? Cell Tech is overpriced sugar with a touch of creatine sprinkled around in it. I won't doubt the success people have had with it; it does work. However, pure creatine powder will ultimately be cheaper and you won't have to worry about the sugar spiking your insulin or turning to fat.
--------------
--JBennett
"I've up-ed my intensity.... now up yours!"
"Pain is only weakness leaving the body."
"Never think of how weak you are; think of how strong you're going to be."
|
|
2003/02/21, 06:34 AM
hey guys thanx much for the info, im glad there is a site like this, and people like you to help!
|
|
2003/02/21, 10:44 AM
When I first started creatine I fell for the cell tech advertising, it was over priced and it made me feel sick. I switched to just regular creatine, and it works just as good, and its much cheaper. Also muscle tech's toll free help line has very poor service, you can't even get a straight answere, all they did was try to sell me more products, I have lost all respect for muscle tech and their products.
--------------
Nathan Gower
"Do not let what you cannot do interfere with what you can do." - John Wooden
|
