|
2004/11/01, 09:28 PM
I really have been wondering, is their any difference?
is one better then the other?
|
|
|
|
2004/11/01, 09:43 PM
You stand completely different, so you'd be targeting different muscle angles...
--------------
t
I count him braver who overcomes his desires than him who conquers his enemies, for the hardest victory is over self. - Aristotle
You have the power to change a life right in your own hands. - Paul Brandt
|
|
2004/11/03, 12:44 PM
front, helps more stablization, I fyou lean over.....weight goes BOOM on the rack. So you have to really keep the back straight and abbs tight. This can be good or bad.
back squats you can lean over a lil more than usual, and doesn't require the same control, as a front squat.
Its liek apples and oranges, both are good at certain things, others not so good.
--------------
GO into battle as if was your last, cause thats the only one you loose!
|
|
2004/11/17, 08:49 PM
Back squats are easier. Its easier to backsquat more than you can front squat. Squats really work the hamstrings and i think f squats work quadriceps more. If you want to get stronger squats will be the predominant one of the two lifts.
--------------
nothingness cannot be defined and the softest thing cannot be snapped...
|
|
2004/11/17, 09:36 PM
got to aim both: different muscles. want good hams, go both and lunges
|
