|
2003/02/27, 12:33 PM
Which supplement works better between Creatine and Andro?
If anyone has taken them both, please tell me which had better results. I currently take Prolab creatine.
|
|
|
|
2003/02/27, 05:09 PM
Andro does not work for everybody. Creatine has also been known not to work, but more people seem to complain that they wasted money on andro products when they should have stuck with just the basics: protein, creatine, and glutamine. I wouldn't recommend that you take andro if you're under 18 yrs old anyway. I mention that because your profile is incomplete I have no idea how old you are or what your goals are.
I have taken both, and I'm currently taking creatine. Andro worked like a champ for me when I hit a plateau; I took Animal Stak. But, as I mentioned above, it doesn't work for everyone. Creatine will give you great results if used properly without the need for andro. My advice: save your money and stick with creatine.
--------------
--JBennett
"I've up-ed my intensity.... now up yours!"
"Pain is only weakness leaving the body."
"Never think of how weak you are; think of how strong you're going to be."
|
|
2003/02/27, 07:03 PM
Creatine is the more sound choice. Creatine is the most researched supplement in history, and have proven over and over that it works. There is that small amount of "non responders", but you have a much better chance of getting your moneys worth out of creatine than any andro.
--------------
Failing to plan is like planning to fail!
|
